Barn Burning Essay -- essays papers

Barn importunate Barn Burning is a sad story because it very clearly shows the classical struggle between the let and the underprivileged classes. Time after time emotions of despair surface from both the protagonist and the antagonist involved in the story. This story outlines devil distinct protagonists and two distinct antagonists. The first two are Colonel Sartoris Snopes (Sarty) and his father Abner Snopes (Ab). Sarty is the protagonist surrounded by his father antagonism whereas Ab is the protagonist antagonized by the accessible structure and the struggle that is imposed on him and his family.The economic status of the main characters is poor, without hope of improving their condition, and at the mercy of a quasi-feudal system in northeast America during the late 1800s. Being a sharecropper, Ab and his family had to share half or two-thirds of the harvest with the lan down(p)er and out of their share pay for the necessities of life. As a result of this status, Ab and his family know from the start what the future will hold -- hard work for their landlord and mere survival for them.No hope for advancement prevails passim the story. Sarty, his brother and the twin sisters have no access to education, as they must spend their time working in the fields or at denture performing familial duties. Nutrition is lacking He could smell the coffee from the room where they would presently eat the cold food remaining from the mid-afternoon meal . As a consequence, poor health combined with inadequate opportunity results in low morale. A morale which the writer is identifying with the middle class of his times that alike quality which in later years would cause his descendants to over-run the engine bef... ...ther and The boy said no subject. Enemy Enemy he thought for a trice he could not even see, could not see that the Justices face was kindly.The storys emotional turns are clearly defined by Sartys thoughts and Abs actions. Sartys dilemma and Abs frustrations continually grab the reader, servicing up a series of emotionally laden dilemmas Given the circumstances of the story, is Abs barn burning justified? Should Sarty tell the landlord that Ab was responsible for burning down the barn? Is the outdated sociological Blaming the Victim theory valid? Is the lose-win arrangement between sharecropper and landowner a morally acceptable one?Burning a barn or any act of economic despair in the form of vandalism is definitely not condoned. However the strange thing is the all of these questions need not to be asked, if economic injustice was not prevalent.